News

23rd Which Way to go?

Leave v Remain


Leave v Remain
Louie Eldouri
USPA NEWS - Only three days left to the Referendum of the people of the UK deciding on the UK staying or leaving the European Union.
Hence it´s a decision of a life time. to decide which way to go and it isn´t easy to think of change that will affect not only our lives but the generations coming after as.
At the beginning let´s test what triggered the enmity of some people to the extent that they want to turn their backs to the EU all together (Vote Leave). Off course there is always people who resist the change (Vote Remain) who see a lot of usefulness in staying within the EU and governed by them.

The United Kingdom joined the EU in 1973, when it was only 9 countries and the purpose of it then was to have a Common Market, which as the name suggests was to find a mutual ground for the members to trade between themselves and to work together and manage their trade with the world.
This off course had nothing to do with controlling lives of the member states´ populations or controlling who they are allowed to make contracts with or make trade
The European Union, has hugely changed purpose from the Common European Market into the Super European State that interferes in aspect of the members states´ people´s lives and suffocates their freedom and democracy with un-elected politicians sitting in Brussels and have the authority to override the laws of the land of any member state.
They can even overturn judgments issued by courts of the member states.
The European Union has expended from six nations when it was initially started in 1951 into the infamous 28 nations after the last three countries have joined; Croatia, Bulgaria and Romania.
More countries are going to join very soon and even more in the pipeline.
5 countries are going to be full members, they are Turkey, Macedonia, Bosnia & Hertzog, Montenegro and Serbia.
In the pipeline there would be Ukraine and Russia to say the least. It can off course be extended to contain countries of the old Soviet Union like Armenia, Georgia, Uzbekistan and probably another 10 countries at least.
A member state like the UK, is not allowed to make trades deals without going through the EU states. So if Britain wanted to sign any agreement with let´s say India, all the other 27 countries have to agree and off course any of them can strike a veto and block the deal.

They say that the government of Britain is the cause of the failing of housing where as everyone know there is a huge shortage because of the big demand for the very little available houses.
This off course has contributed to the massive increase in house prices and in the rent. It has really and truly because an affordable for the key workers to find a house to buy and the same goes for the young people who buy their first time property.
But, even though I agree that the last government and the last mayor of London have failed to build enough houses to reduce the shortage of availability of houses, this can´t be the only reason.
The government should have built more houses, but no matter what number it will build they will be snatched immediately by the migrants coming from Europe and the problem persists.

The NHS is struggling now and wouldn´t be able to cope any longer if Britain stays in the EU and therefore has to abide by the European laws and conventions.
These rules will force the free movement of all the people of member states and no one state is allowed to deny the coming of any of the other member states and to settle and seek work.
How then the NHS be able to cope with all these people coming to stay and work in the UK.
The Migration Watch report is reporting that it is estimated that 265´000 new people will settle in the UK and around 60% of them are from EU.
This estimate as the report suggests, is before the new 5 countries join the EU and the estimate to jump to 420´000 people will settle in the UK every single year.
Off course we can say the same about housing, school places, transport and rest of the infrastructure.

We in the UK want to have trade partnership with our friends in the commonwealth countries (2500 millions) and being a member in the EU we are not allowed to do this.
The same goes for the new emerging countries like China, India or Brazil.
We are not against migration. In fact migrants and immigrants have contributed immensely to the good of the country. We only want the migration to be controlled.
This can´t happen as far as Britain is part of the EU.

This is our chance to get our hands on our destiny and to have a controlled migration and to make trade agreements with whoever is better for the country.

Vote Leave.
Liability for this article lies with the author, who also holds the copyright. Editorial content from USPA may be quoted on other websites as long as the quote comprises no more than 5% of the entire text, is marked as such and the source is named (via hyperlink).